Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Tevin Brevard v. Jennifer Jimenez
as 23-7094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEVIN J. BREVARD
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER JIMENEZ, Officer for HRRJ, DAVID HACKWORTH, Superintendent and M. A. MOORE, Sheriff of Portsmouth, VA
McDaniel v. Layman et al
as 7:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Joshua McDaniel
Defendant:
Sgt. Layman, Ofc. Jimenez and Ofc. Schnepper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. Warden Bailey et al
as 1:2023cv00909
Petitioner:
Idraxion Jimenez
Respondent:
Warden Bailey and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimenez v. Brown-Williams et al
as 2:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Jovino Jimenez
Defendant:
Tammy Brown-Williams, Harold Clarke, Cynthia Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. United States
as 7:2022cv00228
Petitioner:
Jimenez Torres, Hector Jimenez Torrs and Hector Jimenez-Torres
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas et al v. Brown-Williams et al
as 2:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
Carlos Thomas, James H. Dillingham, III, Ernest D. Washington and others
Defendant:
Tammy Brown-Williams, Harold Clarke, Cynthia Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Andrews
as 2:2021cv00286
Petitioner:
Roberto Bustos Jimenez
Respondent:
Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jimenez v. Breckon
as 7:2019cv00667
Petitioner:
Francisco Jimenez
Respondent:
M. Breckon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jimenez v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2018cv02793
Petitioner:
Alejandro Licona Jimenez
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JIMENEZ v. DHS, ICE CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 1:2017cv00948
Petitioner:
ELISEO CONTRERAS JIMENEZ
Respondent:
DHS, ICE CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
