Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,000
Adames v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00319
Petitioner: Alexander Adames
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff: JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Marcos Spencer v. Sergeant Alexander
as 24-6425
Plaintiff: MARCOS SPENCER
Defendant: SERGEANT ALEXANDER
Alexander v. USA
as 3:2024cv00449
Petitioner: James Arden Alexander
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6417
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gaddy v. Alexander Correction Institution et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff: Brandon A Gaddy
Defendant: Alexander Correction Institution, FNU Panero, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01169
Plaintiff: Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant: William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, NDZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Winn v. Irving et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff: Trevelle Alexander Winn
Defendant: Sheriff Antionette Irving and Deputies John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Foster, Jr. v. Warren Alexander
as 24-6313
Plaintiff: MARK BRIAN FOSTER, JR.
Defendant: WARREN ALEXANDER, BRYANT POOLE and CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, Eastern Correctional
Senter v. Haysi Regional Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00237
Plaintiff: Alexander Senter
Defendant: Haysi Regional Jail and Duffield Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?