Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Telly Bristol v. Olinger
as 24-6322
Plaintiff:
TELLY SAVALAS BRISTOL
Defendant:
NURSE PRACTITIONER OLINGER, DR. HAYNES, Psych Senior, BATEMAN, Assistant Warden and others
Bristol v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Telly Savalas Bristol
Defendant:
David Anderson, Dr. Olinger, Dr. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abner v. USA
as 3:2021cv00379
Petitioner:
Ricky Donell Abner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martinez v. USA
as 3:2016cv01257
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Abner Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Roy Hillberry, II v. R. Elder
as 15-6287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY FRANKLIN HILLBERRY, II
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. R. ELDER, in his individual capacity, W. O. STEWART, in his individual capacity, CORP RETA MAYS, in her individual capacity and others
Valentine v. Bodkin et al
as 3:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Valentine
Defendant:
Edward Bodkin, Adam J. Wratchford, Michael W. Zervos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Hillberry, II v. Lt. R. Elder
as 14-6754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY FRANKLIN HILLBERRY, II
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. R. ELDER, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
W. O. STEWART, in his individual capacity, CORP RETA MAYS, in her individual capacity, OFFICER RICHARDS, in his individual capacity and others
Aivarez v. Kozik et al
as 5:2014ct03022
Plaintiff:
Abner Aivarez
Defendant:
Daniel Kozik and City of Dunn Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillberry v. Elder et al
as 5:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Roy Franklin Hillberry, II
Defendant:
R. Elder, W. O. Stewart, Reta Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillberry v. Elder et al
as 2:2013cv21894
Plaintiff:
Roy Franklin Hillberry, II
Defendant:
R. Elder, W. O. Stewart, Reta Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
