Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Santos-Bey et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01490
Petitioner:
Erick Santos-Bey and Lawrence H. Morgan
Respondent:
Anthony Brown and Carlos Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bivens v. USA
as 5:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Randy Lee Bivens
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Carter v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Gilbert, Collins, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Williams et al
as 7:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Williams, White, Still and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Bivens et al
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jachin Boaz Walls, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Carlos Bivens, Dr. Kyle Smith, Andrea Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Causion-El v. Bivens
as 1:2023cv03182
Plaintiff:
Shannon Causion-El
Defendant:
Carlos Bivens
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bivens v. Stirling et al
as 9:2023cv04263
Plaintiff:
Quantavious B. Bivens
Defendant:
Director Bryan Stirling, Deputy Warden D. Harouff, Captain B. Blakeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crouse v. Warden Bivens et al
as 1:2023cv02205
Plaintiff:
Adam Travis Crouse
Defendant:
Warden Bivens, Officer Hague and All of Intel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kemp v. Maryland Division of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv01888
Plaintiff:
Michael Kemp
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Corrections, Carlos Bivens, Todd Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
