Cases 1 - 10 of 218
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christian v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Zane Christian
Respondent:
Unknown and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corbi v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2023ct03362
Plaintiff:
Christian M. Corbi
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhidin Omar v. John Gardner
as 23-7300
Plaintiff:
MUHIDIN SALAD OMAR
Defendant:
JOHN CHRISTIAN GARDNER, Attorney at Law
Christian v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2023cv06889
Petitioner:
Brandon Christian and Brandon Jabar Christian
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Warden Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03521
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas Davis v. Brooks Goldsmith
as 23-7214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REV. THOMAS LOUIS DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOKS P. GOLDSMITH, Judge of Circuits Courts/Retired, RACHEL DEANGELIS, Asst. Solicitor/State Prosecutor, CHRISTIAN D. ANDERSON, Beaufort County Sheriff Dept. and others
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03290
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Monica Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Meadows
as 7:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Christian T. Nealson
Defendant:
Meadows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. USA 2255
as 1:2023cv02105
Petitioner:
Luis Christian Rivera
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
