Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hardee v. Walz et al
as 3:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
John T. Hardee
Defendant:
Christopher Walz, John Doe Villanueva, Eric Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWDEN v. 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OFFICE et al
as 1:2019cv01102
Defendant:
LISA S. COSTNER, DAVID SIPPRELL, OFFICE OF INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN BOWDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Tapp et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
Givonno D Carter
Defendant:
FNU Ingram, FNU Hensley, FNU Morgan and others
Rountree v. Robinson et al
as 7:2018cv00318
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, D. Carter, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Piper A. Rountree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justin Evans v. John Kuplinski
as 16-6136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MARSHALL EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KUPLINSKI, Superintendent, MICHAEL EAVES, Major Director of Security, MAJOR FRANK HOUTTE, Major Director of Medical and others
Defendant:
MELVIN D. CARTER, Assistant Shift Supervisor
Carter v. Hollembaek
as 5:2015hc02171
Petitioner:
Marquise D. Carter
Respondent:
Stephanie Hollembaek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Piper Rountree v. Tammy Brown
as 15-6655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PIPER ANN ROUNTREE
Defendant - Appellee:
TAMMY BROWN
Defendant:
HAROLD CLARK, JOHN JABE, WENDY HOBBS and others
Evans v. Kuplinski et al
as 2:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
Justin Marshall Evans
Defendant:
John Kuplinski, Michael Eaves, Major Frank Houtte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013ct03224
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Defendant:
United States of America, C/O Williamson, C/O Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rountree v. Clark et al
as 7:2011cv00572
Defendant:
J. Bland, V. Booker, D. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Piper A. Rountree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
