Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Underwood v. Sayre et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Owen Underwood
Defendant:
D. T. Sayre, N. G. Elbon, T. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Defendant:
SGT D. T. LENTZ, CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, T. N. BRANCH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Defendant:
RICHARD GOTTLIEB, SGT D. T. LENTZ, ELISABETH FROST DRESEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HYDE-EL v. MILLER et al
as 1:2016cv00897
Plaintiff:
MASON WHITE HYDE-EL
Defendant:
D. T. MILLER, II, ELLEN DRESCHLER, GARY FRANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HYDE-EL v. HARTMAN et al
as 1:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
MASON WHITE HYDE-EL
Defendant:
J. D. HARTMAN, WHITESIDES, D. T. MILLER, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Turner v. Corporal Porter
as 14-6554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY LAMAR TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORPORAL PORTER
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. SMITH, Superintendent, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER VINCENT, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CASIANOS and others
Dixon v. Bryant et al
as 3:2011cv02976
Plaintiff:
John Allen Dixon, Jr
Defendant:
Bruce M Bryant, Richard L Martin, Jr, James F Arwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Hurt v. D. Mahon
as 09-7835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD O. HURT
Defendant - Appellee:
D. T. MAHON, Warden, R. JOHNSON, Dr.; Institutional Doctor, FRED SCHILLINGER, Virginia Department of Corrections; Director and others
Hurt v. Mahon, et al.
as 1:2009cv00958
Plaintiff:
Donald O. Hurt
Defendant:
D. T. Mahon, R. Johnson, Fred Schillinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trisler v. Mahon
as 3:2009cv00167
Petitioner:
Jason Ashford Trisler
Respondent:
D. T. Mahon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
