Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Richardson v. Cook et al
as 4:2023cv06959
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dale Richardson, Curtis Richardson and Curtis D. Richardson
Defendant:
Kaitlin Cook, Columbus County Sheriff's Office, Loris Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Weaver v. Lauren et al
as 7:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Ras Warren Edward Weaver
Defendant:
Head Nurse Lauren, Sargent Steven Smith, Corpral Zackory Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Craven County et al
as 5:2022ct03360
Plaintiff:
Sharif Hakim Moore
Defendant:
Craven County, Jones County, City of New Bern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Hamilton et al
as 5:2021hc02066
Respondent:
D.S. Hall, John Brad Moore, Joshua Hamilton and others
Petitioner:
Jackie Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peyton v. Clark et al
as 7:2012cv00481
Defendant:
Harold W. Clark, D.S. Combs, Sgt. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob D. Peyton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sewell v. Stouffer et al
as 8:2011cv01584
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel E. Sewell
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer, Bobby P. Shearin, Stotter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. BARNES, et al
as 1:2009cv00559
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY BROOKS, III
Defendant:
B.J. BARNES, MONTGOMERY, C. WILLIAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. BARNES et al
as 1:2009cv00214
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY BROOKS, III
Defendant:
B.J. BARNES, MONTGOMERY, C. WILLIAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROOKS v. BARNES et al
as 1:2009cv00187
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY BROOKS, III
Defendant:
B.J. BARNES, MONTGOMERY, HAIRSTON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
THOMAS v. BARNES et al
as 1:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANTHONY THOMAS
Defendant:
B.J. BARNES, R. TINSLEY, D.S. ROBERTSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
