Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,749
Robbie Newby v. David Leu
as 24-6572
Petitioner: ROBBIE LYNN NEWBY
Respondent: DAVID LEU, Warden
Ong v. Greene et al
as 1:2024cv01717
Petitioner: Lye Huat Ong
Respondent: David Greene and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Neil v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02113
Petitioner: David O'Neil
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodney Cobbs v. Ben David
as 24-6571
Plaintiff: RODNEY E. COBBS
Defendant: BEN DAVID and CONNIE JORDAN
Robinson v. Seay et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv02136
Plaintiff: Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant: David Seay, Brian Johnson, Anthony Basile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Barmer v. Pentow
as 1:2024cv01693
Plaintiff: David A. Barmer
Defendant: Alexander Pentow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant: William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff: Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R, A D R and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Cherokee County, et al
as 6:2024cv03423
Plaintiff: David Farrell Sullivan
Defendant: Cherokee County and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Eldridge v. Antonelli
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: David Lee Eldridge
Defendant: Bryan M. Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Barnette et al
as 7:2024cv03401
Plaintiff: John Willie Mack, Jr
Defendant: Barry Joe Barnette, John David Burgess and Manuel J. Ortundo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?