Cases 1 - 10 of 3,136
Fitzgerald v. Jane Doe et al
as 5:2024ct03130
Plaintiff:
Shawreed Jawon Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and John Doe Deputy Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lt. Chandler et al
as 0:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
David Tyran Johnson
Defendant:
Lt. Chandler, Sgt. Calex, SCDC Security Threat Group Intelligence Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wayne v. Hawes et al
as 7:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Robert James Wayne
Defendant:
Spencer Hawes, Kyle Irving, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rufus v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Michael Rufus
Defendant:
Vasquez, Thompson, McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Deputy Angel Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Herman Grant, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Angel Rodriguez, Deputy Richard Sholtz and John Doe Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Powell v. Dexter et al
as 5:2024ct03117
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Powell
Defendant:
Janet Dexter and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haleem v. Abello et al
as 1:2024cv01400
Plaintiff:
Samir Haleem
Defendant:
Frederick Abello and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Adolf et al
as 5:2024ct03112
Plaintiff:
Martinez Orlandis Black
Defendant:
Peter Adolf, Alan Ellis, Noell P. Tin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onaje Seabrook v. LT. Carter
as 24-6461
Plaintiff:
ONAJE KUDURA SEABROOK
Defendant:
LT. CARTER, SGT. MILES PERKINS, JANE DOE #3, Health Care Authority and others
Adonnis Shepheard, Sr. v. Shelby Searls
as 24-6451
Plaintiff:
ADONNIS R. SHEPHEARD, SR.
Defendant:
SHELBY SEARLS, Warden, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer, JANE DOE, Nurse and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
