Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Moyler v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Thomas Moyler and Shiek Thomas Moyler-Bey
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, D. Anderson, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ra v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ashann Ra and Ashaun Ra
Defendant:
David E. Anderson, Lt. J.B. Robinson, Lt. R. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SATTERFIELD v. SEIFERT et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER J.F. SEIFERT and ROXBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SATTERFIELD v. SEIFERT
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
J.F. SEIFERT, HOLLIE MCCADDAMS, CITY OF ROXBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SATTERFIELD v. SEIFERT et al
as 1:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
J.F. SEIFERT, T.J. KNAUB, THERESSA K. PRESSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowlings v. Caraway et al
as 3:2019cv00190
Defendant:
Warden, Lt. on duty at lock-up, others unknown at this time and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon B. Dowlings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyer v. Burreal et al
as 5:2018ct03252
Defendant:
Stephanie Hollemback, Amy Bullock, Unnamed Federal Bureau of Prisons employees and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oden v. Wilson et al
as 3:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Oden
Defendant:
Eric Wilson, Ian Connors, J.F. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oden v. Mcormick et al
as 3:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Oden
Defendant:
Tracy D. Mcomick, Eric Wilson, Mack Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee Farkas v. J.F. Andrews
as 17-7409
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEE BENTLEY FARKAS
Respondent - Appellee:
J.F. ANDREWS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
