Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Robinson v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Ra'Quan Robinson
Defendant:
Warden David Anderson, A.W. Bateman, C.O. Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Beasley v. T. Peyton
as 24-6047
Plaintiff:
MR. WALTER RAY BEASLEY
Defendant:
MRS. T. PEYTON, Kitchen Supervisor, MR. LARRY LEABOUGH, Head Superintendent, MR. MARK CULVER, Lieutenant and others
Bellamy v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections et al
as 9:2023cv04503
Plaintiff:
Bradley Bellamy
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept. of Corrections, Warden Wallace, Kitchen Supervisor Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Miller v. Mr. Vorhes
as 22-7162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
VORHES, Kitchen Supervisor, MR. BODIE, Kitchen Supervisor and JOHN DOE, Kitchen Staff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv01664
Plaintiff:
Clinton D Johnson, Jr and Kayzon Ru
Defendant:
Lt Jernigan, Officer Loutz, Ronald Hazzard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Willett et al
as 1:2019cv01159
Defendant:
Captain S. Cook, Captain B. Hughes, Major M. Clavear and others
Plaintiff:
Donnell D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 5:2018cv01521
Plaintiff:
Corey Jawan Robinson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Joette Scarbrough, Charline McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nureni v. Foxwell et al
as 1:2018cv01169
Plaintiff:
Muyideen Nureni
Defendant:
Warden Foxwell and Kitchen Supervisor Troxell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabbagestalk v. Smith et al
as 5:2014cv00268
Plaintiff:
Shaheen Cabbagestalk
Defendant:
Willie F Smith, Mr Fedd, All Kitchen Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
