Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Michael Greene v. Kevin Mullis
as 24-6095
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE GREENE
Defendant:
KEVIN R. MULLIS, formerly Chief of Police of the Town of Lilesville, as the Chief of Police of the Lilesville Police Department at the times relevant to the matters complained of herein; and, TOWN OF LILESVILLE, NC, an incorporated municipality within the State of North Carolina and KEVIN R. MULLIS, in his Individual Capacity
HARRIS v. THE STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ET AL
as 1:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE HARRIS
Defendant:
THE STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBIN PENDERGRAFT and SHARON R HINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Leu et al
as 1:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
James W Brown, Matthew J Collins, Michael Vasquez and others
Defendant:
D. Leu, D. Smith, R. Carmona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. DCR/SCRJ et al
as 2:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee King
Defendant:
DCR/SCRJ and LT. Jaburs Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kiser v. Bracy et al
as 5:2021ct03145
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Kiser
Defendant:
Brian Keith Massey, Sr. and Chief Jimmy Bracy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Unknown
as 1:2020cv01368
Defendant:
Unknown
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOUGLAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00937
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LEE DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gray v. USA
as 3:2020cv00160
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Gray, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cousins v. Blue Ridge Regional Jail Authority et al
as 7:2019cv00758
Defendant:
Blue Ridge Regional Jail Authority and Amherst Co. Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Cousins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy v. Parson et al
as 3:2019cv00658
Defendant:
Parson and J. Goodson Belcher
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
