Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RENZI v. NAPHCARE, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER RENZI
Defendant:
NAPHCARE, INC., BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, JR., BRIAN L. GILROY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Michael Hoiness v. Dr. Abdul Jalaludeen
as 23-6137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. HOINESS
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. ABDUL JALALUDEEN, Physician, KATIE CARTWRIGHT, Physician's Assistant, J. DULEY, Registered Nurse and others
Defendant:
NAPHCARE, INC., Health Care Provider
Bobbitt v. Hash et al
as 7:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Mark Francis Bobbitt
Defendant:
Sheriff Antonio Hash and NaphCare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Bell et al
as 7:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Davayon Jerrell Saunders
Defendant:
Sheriff David Bell, Roanoke City Jail Medical Department, Head of Roanoke City Jail Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Naphcare, Inc., et al.
as 5:2021ct03099
Defendant:
Christy Bunn, Joseph Lee Hackett, Thomas B. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Denise Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS v. NAPHCARE, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00974
Defendant:
MICHAEL VAN SICKLE, IVY MANNING, AMY JO ROSENTHAL and others
Plaintiff:
ROBIN DENISE PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoiness v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00358
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Hoiness
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Abdul Jalaludeen and Katie Cartwright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowart v. Jamaludeen et al
as 1:2016cv01305
Plaintiff:
Troy David Cowart
Defendant:
Abdul Jamaludeen, Yolanda Vines and NaphCare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond, Jr. v. NaphCare Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00411
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Raymond, Jr.
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc., Matt Piro and Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. NAPHCARE et al
as 2:2014cv00323
Plaintiff:
Jovaughn Baker
Defendant:
NAPHCARE and Naphcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
