Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,784
Huffman v. Large et al
as 7:2024cv00415
Plaintiff: Jullian Andrew Huffman
Defendant: Doctor Crystal Large, Captain S. Gullett, K. Helton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakeney v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00413
Plaintiff: Dean Blakeney
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, Warden D. Anderson, Lt. R. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ra v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00406
Plaintiff: Ashan Ra
Defendant: David E. Anderson, Lt. J.B. Robinson, Lt. R. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Irving
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner: Jonathan R. Wilson
Respondent: Sheriff Antionette Irving
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RUTLEDGE v. RUTLEDGE-CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER R. RUTLEDGE
Defendant: SHANNON RUTLEDGE-CHAMBERS, DUKE UNIVERSITY, RHINE RESEARCH CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Brown v. Farrell et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff: Michael E. Brown
Defendant: Paul T. Farrell, Tim Armstead, Elizabeth D. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. NC Department of Public Safety - DPS
as 24-6605
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant: NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, -DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, SERGEANT HESTER and others
Moran v. USA
as 5:2024cv00343
Petitioner: Emilio R. Moran
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Wilson v. McCall
as 3:2024cv00456
Plaintiff: Jonathan R. Wilson
Defendant: Leonard McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corey Johnson v. A. Walker
as 24-6584
Plaintiff: COREY E. JOHNSON
Defendant: A. WALKER, MR. BELL, R. LANGFORD and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?