Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hudson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Ice Tee Hudson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00174
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hudson v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
Ice Tee Hudson
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simms-Lewis v. Tee et al
as 1:2021cv02830
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Simms-Lewis
Defendant:
Officer Ms. Tee, Warden Obello, Governor Larry Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Olandio Ray Workman v. Dorothy Manigault
as 17-6566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DOROTHY A. MANIGAULT, GREENVILLE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, JOHN INGLIS MAULDIN and others
Workman v. Manigault et al
as 6:2016cv04002
Plaintiff:
Orlandio Ray Workman
Defendant:
Dorothy Manigault, Greenville County Public Defenders Office, John I Mauldin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
US v. Lowell Knight
as 16-7685
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LOWELL ANTHONY KNIGHT, a/k/a Tee, a/k/a Ant, a/k/a Wockka Flocka
US v. Latrone Hick
as 15-6593
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LATRONE ANTONIO HICKS, a/k/a Tee
Nuten v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00356
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
Toma Tee Nuten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowers v. United States Federal Government et al
as 7:2007cv00302
Plaintiff:
Dylan Tee Bowers
Defendant:
United States Federal Government, Tony Diorno, Snapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
