Cases 1 - 10 of 212
Andred Davis, Jr. v. Donald Ames
as 23-7291
Plaintiff:
ANDRED CLINTON DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
DONALD F. AMES, Warden, JASON BRAGG, Unit Manager, RICHARD TONEY, Captain and others
Andred Davis, Jr. v. Paul Diamond
as 23-7284
Plaintiff:
ANDRED CLINTON DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
PAUL DIAMOND, CHRISTOPHER FLEMING, BETSY JIVIDEN and others
Latimore v. Clinton Police Department
as 6:2023cv05390
Plaintiff:
Denzell Tyree Latimore
Defendant:
City of Clinton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Clinton v. Lancaster SC, City of et al
as 0:2023cv05338
Plaintiff:
Quinterius Lamont Clinton
Defendant:
Lancaster SC, City of, Sean Donald Taylor and Phillip Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Ivey v. Restrepo et al
as 1:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Clinton Matthew Ivey
Defendant:
L. I. Restrepo, A. Cordon, Majette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03234
Plaintiff:
Robert Clinton Henry
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Roderick K. Watson and Timothy P. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Clinton v. Gina Groh
as 23-6687
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY K. CLINTON
Defendant / Appellee:
GINA M. GROH
Clinton Johnson, Jr. v. B. Dancelon
as 23-6480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON DOUGLAS JOHNSON, JR., a/k/a Kayzon Ru
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER B. R. DANCELON, BLAKE A. NORTON, SHAWN D. CHASTIN and others
Johnson v. Dubose et al
as 5:2023cv01970
Plaintiff:
Clinton D Johnson, Jr, Clinton D Johnson, Clinton Douglas Johnson, Jr and others
Defendant:
Kim Rutz Dubose, Jeremy Chapman and Oconee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
CLINTON v. BUCHHOLTZ et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
REGINALD D. CLINTON
Defendant:
PETER BUCHHOLTZ, MELANIE SHELTON and RAMON GUTIERREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
