Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Williams v. Connors et al
as 5:2020ct03189
Defendant:
J. Wade, Director Inch, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Webster Douglas Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Officers et al
as 5:2019ct03316
Defendant:
Director Inch, Thomas R Kane, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Webster Douglas Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lyttle v. Kane
as 5:2019hc02013
Petitioner:
Melvin Ray Lyttle
Respondent:
Thomas R Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jerome Todd v. Zachary Sullivan
as 18-6317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME EUGENE TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
ZACHARY J. SULLIVAN, Trial Attorney, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General of the United States, individual and official capacities, JAMES L. ROBERT, United States District Federal Judge, individual capacity and others
Hopper v. Session et al
as 5:2017cv03364
Plaintiff:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Defendant:
Jefferson B Session, III, Thomas R Kane, H Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv01176
Petitioner:
Brian Antwanine Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America, Thomas R. Kane, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Todd v. Sullivan et al
as 6:2017cv02696
Plaintiff:
Jerome Eugene Todd
Defendant:
Zachary J Sullivan, Jeff Sessions, James L Robert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Ross et al
as 2:2017cv02363
Plaintiff:
Carlton Leon Hammonds, Jr
Defendant:
C Ross, E Slater, Regional Director Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. Samuels
as 3:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Charles Derrick Keller
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilbert-Bey v. Kane et al
as 5:2017ct03128
Plaintiff:
Reginald Thaddeus Gilbert-Bey
Defendant:
Thomas R Kane, Donna C. Smith, Candice Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
