Cases 1 - 10 of 370
Dixon v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Hunter Dixon
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, J. Artrip, Major Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Khamari Hunter
Defendant:
Trisha Brown, Gabe Morgan and Garrett Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. USA
as 3:2024cv00509
Petitioner:
Reginald Anthony Hunter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ali v. Dexter et al
as 5:2024ct03103
Plaintiff:
Abdulkadir Sharif Ali
Defendant:
Janet M. Dexter, Hunter Fonvielle, Kayla Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capps v. Hunter et al
as 5:2024ct03079
Plaintiff:
Edward Rummus Capps, III
Defendant:
Sargent T. Hunter, Sargent Farrow and Warden Steven Wadell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Stonebreaker et al
as 1:2024cv01541
Plaintiff:
Gary Jason Griffin
Defendant:
Warden Donnie Stonebreaker, Jr, Associate Warden Gause, Associate Warden Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Frazier v. Hunter et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Frazier
Defendant:
Captin M Hunter, Lt June, Lt Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gragg v. Keller et al
as 7:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Hunter Tracey Gragg
Defendant:
Major Keller, Trinity Food Services and WVRJA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Stirling et al
as 4:2024cv00547
Petitioner:
Troy Darnell Hunter
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. USA
as 3:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Herman Lamark Hunter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
