Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Witherspoon v. Warden, Ronald S. Weber
as 1:2024cv01551
Respondent:
Warden, Ronald S. Weber
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv01084
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Respondent:
Warden Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Edward Witherspoon
Defendant:
Ronald S Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WITHERSPOON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00209
Petitioner:
JIMMY JAMES WITHERSPOON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE IN CASE 5:21-CT-3270-D Edwards v. Hooks et al
as 5:2021cv00352
Plaintiff:
Tracey Edwards
Defendant:
Erik Hooks, Benita J. Witherspoon, Claudette Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Hooks et al
as 5:2021ct03270
Plaintiff:
Tracey Edwards
Defendant:
Erik Hooks, Benita J. Witherspoon, Claudette Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Davis et al
as 5:2021cv01763
Defendant:
Lt Davis, Capt Witherspoon, Capt McFadden and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2021ct03131
Defendant:
Tamara S. Lyn, Richard Engel, Warden Thomas Scarantino and others
Plaintiff:
Shontonio Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witherspoon v. McCoy et al
as 5:2021ct03060
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Governor Roy Cooper and Supt. Timothy McCoy
Plaintiff:
Theatric Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. Government of China
as 4:2020cv03893
Plaintiff:
Albert Lee Witherspoon
Defendant:
Government of China
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
