Cases 101 - 110 of 1,187
Hill-Bey v. Banner Life Insurance Co. et al
as 1:2023cv00769
Defendant:
W. Daniel Miles, Banner Life Insurance Co., George W. Walker, III and others
Plaintiff:
Terry San Juan Hill-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Walter Edward Hayden et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01746
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Hayden, John Lawrence Kemp, Gregory David Kaser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
US v. Juan Martinez
as 23-4276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN DANIEL MARTINEZ, a/k/a Amigo
Randolph v. Clayton et al
as 1:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
Juan Alex Randolph, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Clayton, Officer COII J. Milliner and Officer West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Yomere Busbee
as 23-4227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
YOMERE JUAN BUSBEE, a/k/a Ram
HUNTER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00259
Petitioner:
JUAN ANTONIO HUNTER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Arvizu-Hernandez v. Ray et al
as 3:2023cv00060
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Arvizu-Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden Ray and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia-Garcia v. Rokosky et al
as 3:2023cv00016
Petitioner:
Juan Garcia-Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. Juan Soto
as 23-4132
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS SOTO, a/k/a Juan Carlos Soto Vallejos
Juan Arvizu-Hernandez v. US
as 23-6045
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS ARVIZU-HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ACTING WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
