Cases 101 - 110 of 641
BAXTER v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS BAXTER
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, ROY COOPER, SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Todd Ishee
as 22-6462
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Respondent / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, NCDPS Prisons Director, DENISE JACKSON, PRESCOTT WILLIAMS and others
Hinton v. Jones et al
as 5:2022hc02067
Petitioner:
Charles Everette Hinton
Respondent:
Timothy P. Jones, Roy Cooper and NC Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Meyers v. Captain Boxer
as 22-6359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN BOXER, LIEUTENANT MOSLEY, A. DAVID ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
James v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022ct03110
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Roy Cooper, Todd Pomeroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerome Butts v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6289
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEROME JILAH BUTTS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and ROY COOPER
Martin v. Locklear et al
as 5:2022ct03095
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Martin, III
Defendant:
Mary Locklear, Todd Ishee and Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
