Cases 111 - 120 of 369
Floyd v. Hansen et al
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
Donna Hansen, Cleveland Friday, Ms. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Nines
as 1:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Jeffery Nines and Chief of Security Ronald Stotler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Moke
as 1:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
Captain Moke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. D.O.C. Commissioner et al
as 1:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
D.O.C. Commissioner, Annie Harvey and Cleveland Friday
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. A. Smith
as 23-6095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. A. SMITH, CORPORAL BARNES, CORPORAL HENRY and others
Floyd v. Nines et al
as 1:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Jeffery Nines, Ronald Stotler and Ms. Sharon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Keesee et al
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lamont Sutton
Defendant:
Travis Eugene Keesee, Troy Nolan Miller and Dustin Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Floyd v. MRDCC Medical Department et al
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
MRDCC Medical Department, RN Prince Talo and Dr Mulugeta B. Akal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Equity Residential, et al.
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Eloise Woods
Defendant:
Equity Residential, Equity Residential Management LLC., Samuel Zell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Emrich et al
as 7:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Claude Young Alexander
Defendant:
John A. Emrich, Robert Nolan, David Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
