Cases 11 - 20 of 3,294
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Adams v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv02603
Plaintiff:
Kent Adams
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Adam Casey v. Nancie Williams
as 24-1371
Plaintiff:
ADAM NICHOLAS CASEY
Defendant:
NANCIE WILLIAMS, D.B.A. Judge "JDR" Warren County Court, Juvenile Domestic Relations and UNKNOWN, Individual at the Court Hearing Representing Department of Social Services Child Support Enforcement Division
Adams v. Del Toro
as 1:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Adams
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Watson v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Darrell N. Watson
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Rick White, Captain Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeiuLio v. Baydu
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Adam M. DeiuLio
Defendant:
Dr. Baydu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. Adams et al
as 7:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Counselor P. Adams and Major Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Norwood et al
as 5:2024ct03089
Plaintiff:
Shurod Rankin
Defendant:
Lieutenant Norwood, Sergeant P. Fobbs and Major Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
