Cases 11 - 20 of 9,235
Jones v. Charleston County et al
as 6:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Nekeya Jones
Defendant:
Charleston County, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Wellpath LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hall v. Powell
as 2:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Shelby Hall
Defendant:
Michele H. Powell
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Padilla v. Judicial District Court Dallas Co. Courthouse et al
as 3:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Antonio H Padilla
Defendant:
Judicial District Court Dallas Co. Courthouse, U.S. Dist. Et. N. of TX; Dallas Division and Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Robert English
as 24-4284
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT EDGAR ENGLISH, a/k/a H. B., a/k/a Hot Boy, a/k/a Head Buster
Santos-Bey et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01490
Petitioner:
Erick Santos-Bey and Lawrence H. Morgan
Respondent:
Anthony Brown and Carlos Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arevalo Benitez v. Kim et al
as 8:2024cv01440
Plaintiff:
Pedro Pablo Arevalo Benitez
Defendant:
Shina Kim, Keon H. Kim, Milestone Automotive Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
