Cases 11 - 20 of 15,527
Ward v. Liebel-Flarsheim, LLC
as 5:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Terry Ward
Defendant:
Liebel-Flarsheim, LLC d/b/a Guerbet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wong v. Countyline Auto Center Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Susanne Wong
Respondent:
Countyline Auto Center Inc. d/b/a Lexus of Pembroke Pines, a Florida based automobile dealership, Toyota Financial Services Securities USA Corporation and TQI Exchange, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Sterling Moore d/b/a Outer Banks Adventures;
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Walther Arriaza-Ramirez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1501
Petitioner:
WALTHER ARRIAZA-RAMIREZ, a/k/a Walter Alexy Arriaza-Ramirez
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Claudia Matute-Juarez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1505
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA ROSSANA MATUTE-JUAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Westbrook v. Rare Hospitality International, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01574
Plaintiff:
Arntrice Westbrook
Defendant:
Rare Hospitality International, Inc. d/b/a Longhorn Steakhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harris, o/b/o M.I.D.H., a minor v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Aleshia Harris, o/b/o M.I.D.H., a minor
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
