Cases 11 - 20 of 2,676
Sprouse v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01242
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Sprouse
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2051
Smith-Joseph v. Berryhill
as 1:2020cv02494
Plaintiff:
Laquanda Smith-Joseph
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Duke v. Berryhill
as 1:2020cv00831
Plaintiff:
Laurie A. Miller Duke
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2051
Berryhill v. Phelps
as 5:2020cv02322
Petitioner:
Joshua Keaton Berryhill
Respondent:
Warden Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ross v. Berryhill
as 1:2020cv01157
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Ira Jerome Ross
Adrienne Mallard v. Nancy Berryhill
as 20-1499
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner of Operations, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIENNE MALLARD
Sara Moore v. Andrew Saul
as 20-1260
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARA MOORE
Beck v. Berryhill
as 8:2020cv00607
Plaintiff:
Jon-Peter Beck
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jimenez v. Berryhill
as 3:2020cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jasmine T. Jimenez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas Richards, Jr. v. Nancy Berryhill
as 19-2455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS G. RICHARDS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Social Security Administration Commissioner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
