Cases 11 - 20 of 143
US v. Tico Bynum
as 22-1559
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TICO JERMAINE BYNUM, MALCOLM BYNUM and DONALD BYNUM
Bynum v. Kijikazi
as 4:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Debbie Ann Bynum
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijikazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
US v. Tico Bynum
as 22-1108
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TICO JERMAINE BYNUM, MALCOLM BYNUM and DONALD BYNUM
Beason et al v. Bynum
as 5:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Clarence Beason and Angie Beason
Defendant:
Colin Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Meyers v. M. Perry
as 21-7701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
M. PERRY, Intel Officer, L. DARBY, Intel Officer, M. NELSON, Intel Officer and others
US v. Marques Bynum
as 21-4359
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUES DRAKEFORD BYNUM, a/k/a markie_zkidluv6, a/k/a keyido126@netzero.net
Boley v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00197
Defendant:
LPN Arleathia Peck, Joel Guy, LPN Charlette Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Adm. James A. Boley and James A. Boley, Jr., Administrator of the estate of Robert Lee Boley, deceased
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Bynum et al
as 3:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Donald Bynum, Tico Jermaine Bynum and Malcolm Bynum
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Meyers v. Perry et al
as 2:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Officer Mr. Lockhart, Ofc. Ms. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coriante Pierce v. Lindsey Spain
as 21-6056
Defendant / Appellee:
SANTANA DEBERRY, ROBERT MCCASLIN, M.D., CLARENCE BIRKHEAD, Sheriff Durham County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORIANTE L. PIERCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
