Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Canterbury et al v. White Pine Insurance Company
as 5:2020cv00241
Plaintiff:
CLC Enterprises, Inc. and Robert Canterbury
Defendant:
White Pine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tecnocap, LLC v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Worker International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC et al
as 5:2020cv00003
Plaintiff:
Tecnocap, LLC
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Worker International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Worker International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC Local Union 152M
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC, Local 5668
as 2:2019cv00823
Plaintiff:
Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC, Local 5668
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
NLRB v. Tecnocap, LLC
as 19-2191
Respondent:
TECNOCAP, LLC
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC
Badalato v. Wish to Give Production LLC, et al
as 7:2019cv00066
Defendant:
International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States Its Territories and Canada, AFL-CIO, CLC, Val T. Hill, IATSE Local 491 and others
Plaintiff:
William F. (Billy) Badalato
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Tecnocap, LLC v. United Steel, Paper and Forest
as 19-1263
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL & SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION AFL-CIO/CLC, Local Union No. 152M
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TECNOCAP, LLC
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC
as 2:2018cv01414
Defendant:
Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial, and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Tecnocap LLC
as 5:2018cv00184
Defendant:
Tecnocap LLC
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial, and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC et al
as 2:2018cv01404
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC, Local 5668
Plaintiff:
Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial, and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Tecnocap LLC
as 5:2018cv00163
Defendant:
Tecnocap LLC
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial, and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
