Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Ester Bullock v. Frank Kendall
as 21-2111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTER BULLOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK KENDALL, Secretary, Department of the Air Force
Clara Parada-Castro v. William Barr
as 20-2145
Petitioner:
CARLOS EMMANUEL NATIVI-PARADA, SINTIA ESTER NATIVI-PARADA, CLARA LULU PARADA-CASTRO and others
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02863
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Guillermina Rayo Mejia v. R. Elliot Edwards
as 17-2305
Petitioner:
GUILLERMINA RAYO MEJIA, D.M.R., M.S.M.R. and others
Respondent:
R. ELLIOT EDWARDS, Court Administrator, V. STUART COUCH, Immigration Judge and JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General of the United States for the Executive Office for Immigration Review, Board of Immigration Appeals, an Independent Agency of the Department of Justice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moreno v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
Ester Moreno
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William H. Smith v. Christopher Bailey
as 16-6687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER BAILEY, Officer, ROBERT SODORSKY, Lieutenant, LOUIS RICHARDSON, Lieutenant and others
Boarman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02332
Plaintiff:
Ester Elizabeth Boarman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Bailey et al
as 1:2015cv01590
Plaintiff:
William H. Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Bailey, Robert Sodorsky, Louis Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv03938
Plaintiff:
Ester Simpson
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
