Cases 11 - 20 of 24
E. Frank Smith Residential Design, Inc. et al v. Trenkelbach et al
as 3:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
E. Frank Smith Residential Design, Inc. and Eugene Franklin Smith
Defendant:
Curtis L. Trenkelbach , InterCon Building Corporation of North Carolina , C. Scott Brooks and others
Counter_claimant:
Curtis L. Trenkelbach and InterCon Building Corporation of North Carolina
Counter_defendant:
E. Frank Smith Residential Design, Inc. and Eugene Franklin Smith
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
smith
as 1:2010cv00360
Plaintiff:
franklin smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Lawrence Paulin, Jr. v. Franklin Smith
as 09-6474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE CORNELIUS PAULIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKLIN SMITH, former Chief Jailer
SMITH et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00330
Plaintiff:
RANDALL FRANKLIN SMITH and ANN R. SMITH
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jenkins v. Smith
as 3:2008cv00434
Plaintiff:
Esau Jenkins, III
Defendant:
Franklin Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bunch v. Smith
as 4:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Dempsey L Bunch
Defendant:
Franklin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Paulin v. Smith
as 6:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Cornelius Paulin, Jr
Defendant:
Franklin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Smith v. Beasley et al
as 0:2007cv02670
Petitioner:
Zachary Franklin Smith
Respondent:
David Beasley, Strom Thurmond, Michael Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Beasely et al
as 0:2007cv01641
Plaintiff:
Zachary Franklin Smith
Defendant:
Governor Beasely, Ereast Holland, Michael Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
