Cases 11 - 20 of 494
New York Life Insurance Company v. Sallet et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
New York Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dexter Sallet, Andrea Hart and Ralph Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
HART v. USA
as 1:2024cv00170
Petitioner:
JORDAN HART
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HART v. USA
as 1:2024cv00141
Petitioner:
JORDAN HART
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Carr v. Hart
as 7:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Charles Carr
Defendant:
Attorney Gene Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart et al v. Carver
as 1:2023cv03499
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Hart and Andrew Hart
Defendant:
Willie Edward Carver, Jr. and Willie Edward Taylor Carver, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Hart v. Hart et al
as 1:2023cv03498
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Hart
Defendant:
Andrew Hart and Willie Edward Carver, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 Federal Tort Claims Act - Personal Injury
Hart v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv06754
Plaintiff:
Sherita Hart
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Logistics, Inc., Dunamis Coalition, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Rhyne v. Hart
as 2:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Rhyne
Defendant:
Officer Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Rock Hill Police Department et al
as 0:2023cv05881
Plaintiff:
Jerome Vernard Hart
Defendant:
Rock Hill Police Department, Terry Officer Nelson, Officer Tarisha Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darlene Hart et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05399
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Darlene Hart and Kenneth Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
