Cases 11 - 20 of 121
Inman v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety
as 1:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
James Ross Inman
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Parsons v. Warden Hawkins
as 21-7611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL B. PARSONS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN HAWKINS, CAROLINE FLEMING, CRISTEL VAUGHAN and others
Defendant:
GOVERNOR ROY COOPER, DIRECTOR TODD E. ISHEE and KIMBERLY D. GRANDE, Grievance Examiner
Inman v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021ct03325
Plaintiff:
Christopher Inman and Christopher Alan Inman
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Lumberton Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Inman et al v. City of Roanoke, Virginia
as 7:2021cv00462
Plaintiff:
Kyle Inman, James D. Reynolds, Jr. and Nicholas J. Sosik
Defendant:
City of Roanoke, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
David Washington v. Jenny Kitchings
as 21-1320
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL E. SHEAROUSE, JENNY ABBOTT KITCHINGS and INMAN
Powers v. Junker et al
as 5:2020ct03375
Plaintiff:
Marvin C. Powers
Defendant:
Dr. Nelson, Dr. James Clare, Dr. Gary Junker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Kitchings et al
as 4:2020cv03569
Plaintiff:
David J. Washington
Defendant:
Jenny Abbott Kitchings, Officer Inman and Daniel E. Shearouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOWERY v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00888
Defendant:
SAUNDERS, J. JESSUP, D. BARROW and others
Plaintiff:
KENYANA LOWERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damian Inman v. Aaron Dewitt
as 20-7324
Defendant / Appellee:
AARON DEWITT and RAYMOND GATHERS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMIAN INMAN
Martin v. Fairfield County Sheriff Department et al
as 0:2020cv01400
Defendant:
Sergeant Chris Darner, Sergeant Timothy Inman, Deputy Samantha Demirtas and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
