Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Morgan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12088
Plaintiff:
Susan J. Morgan and Lance Morgan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30239
Plaintiff:
Sara Belle Morgan and Samuel J. Morgan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butts v. Leebler et al
as 3:2013cv00582
Plaintiff:
Ronald T. Butts
Defendant:
M. Leebler and J. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv12913
Plaintiff:
Brenda J. Morgan and James E. Morgan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morgan et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv05514
Plaintiff:
Angela Ruth Morgan and Timothy J. Morgan
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Earl Morgan, III v. R. Lewi
as 13-6023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL J. MORGAN, III
Defendant - Appellee:
R. K. LEWIS, HCC Captain, J. W. KING, HCC Sergeant, DOBYNS, Sergeant and others
Defendant:
PATRICK J. GURNEY, HCC Assist. Warden and DANIEL T. MAHON
Linda Morgan v. Elkay Mining Company
as 12-2032
Petitioner:
LINDA J. MORGAN, widow of Noble M. Morgan
Respondent:
ELKAY MINING COMPANY and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
William v. Newhart et al
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome William
Defendant:
John R. Newhart, Ms. Christopher, Mr. Hercules and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Stouffer et al
as 8:2012cv00524
Plaintiff:
Craig Neal
Defendant:
Michael J. Stouffer , Solomon Hejirika, Sr. , Kathleen Landerkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan, III v. Lewis et al
as 1:2011cv01150
Plaintiff:
Earl J. Morgan, III
Defendant:
R. K. Lewis, J. W. King, Dobyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
