Cases 11 - 20 of 7,664
Jones v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02110
Petitioner:
Michael Contrez Jones
Respondent:
Warden Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 6:2024cv03394
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E Jones
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Allen v. Allen et al
as 5:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Kathy R. Allen
Defendant:
Arthur L. Allen, Anthony A. Klish, State Employees Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chesapeake Bank v. Jones, et al.
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Bank
Defendant:
Stella Gale Jones, Perfect Touch Innovations, LLC and Valley Communities Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Jones v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Jones
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director Department Corrections
as 1:2024cv00976
Petitioner:
Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Director Department Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02107
Petitioner:
Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ABNER, SHANE BOGGS, PATRICK BOWLING and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BROOKS v. RICKER et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN A. BROOKS
Defendant:
OFFICER RICKER, OFFICER JONES, OFFICER SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. MCLEAN et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
YAW NYADU HARRISON
Defendant:
ZERRANTI MCLEAN, JOHN DOE, MR. NEU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
