Cases 11 - 20 of 21
US v. John Adam
as 13-4360
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN ADAMS, a/k/a L. J., a/k/a Little Johnny
Uhlig LLC v. John Shirley
as 12-2336
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UHLIG LLC
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
COX CUSTOMMEDIA INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN ADAM SHIRLEY and PRISM CONTENT SOLUTIONS LLC
Defendant:
EVENTELOPE LLC, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Uhlig LLC v. John Shirley
as 12-2073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UHLIG LLC
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
COX CUSTOMMEDIA INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ADAM SHIRLEY, PRISM CONTENT SOLUTIONS LLC and EVENTELOPE LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, TODD BALDREE and others
Uhlig LLC v. John Shirley
as 12-2014
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UHLIG LLC
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
COX CUSTOMMEDIA INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN ADAM SHIRLEY, PRISM CONTENT SOLUTIONS LLC and EVENTELOPE LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, TODD BALDREE and others
Adams et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02080
Plaintiff:
Wendy Adams and John Adams
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv01208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01010
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. John Martin
as 11-6486
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN ADAM MARTIN
Adams v. Kuretza et al
as 1:2009cv00159
Plaintiff:
John Adams
Defendant:
Steve Kuretza, Steve Kuretza, Metso Paper USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Agumagu v. Major et al
as 6:2009cv02677
Plaintiff:
Maurice Antoine Agumagu
Defendant:
Simon Major, Darrell Mcghaney, John Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
