Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Ogden et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01703
Defendant:
NSK PRECISION AMERICA, INC., NSK Limited, Williams Fire & Hazard Control and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Brett Ogden and Brandon Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bulluck v. Martin et al
as 1:2020cv00292
Defendant:
Larry Earl and Michael Martin
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Bulluck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Collins v. Michael Martin
as 20-6874
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLY LANTHAM, Chief of Security, THOMAS HARLAN, Associate Warden of Security, MICHAEL MARTIN, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO COLLINS
Martin v. USA - 2255
as 1:2020cv01708
Petitioner:
Michael Martin
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
John Walters v. Michael Martin
as 19-7391
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTIN, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Respondent:
JOHN T. MURPHY
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN WALTERS
Collins v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Kelly Lantham, Michael Martin, Sherry Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Jividen et al
as 1:2019cv00100
Respondent:
Joe Shiflett, Keefe, Amanda Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Timberlake Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv00055
Defendant:
Kelly Lantham, Michael Martin, Sherry Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanham v. Sandy et al
as 3:2019cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Lanham
Defendant:
Michael Martin, Jeff S. Sandy, Sherry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Martin v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 19-1099
Defendant:
LOCKE ROWE, INC., SMITH-ROWE, INC. and CHIPANLOG, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, FLATIRON-BLYTHE DEVELOPMENT, a Joint Venture, SMITH-ROWE, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MARTIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
