Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Acosta v. Woo Lae Oak Food Group, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00785
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant: Woo Lae Oak Food Group, LLC, Hang Nam Paik and Kyung Hee Paik
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01749
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ong et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2016cv03942
Plaintiff: Tina Ong , Han Nam Ong , Enung Njoman and others
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Precision Franchising LLC v. Joseph Auto Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01321
Plaintiff: Precision Franchising LLC
Defendant: Joseph Auto Service, Inc. , Kyu Duk Chang and Nam Y. Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Franchise
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2015cv01931
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nam v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00680
Plaintiff: Ju U. Nam
Defendant: Hilton Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KUNG v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv00839
Plaintiff: HAN SUN NAM KUNG
Defendant: AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Pham v. Teffeau et al
as 2:2013cv02131
Plaintiff: Nam-Kha Pham
Defendant: Lewis John Teffeau, PCA Pain Care Center of Cary PLLC and David Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Yu v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01507
Plaintiff: Nam C. Yu
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nam v. 7-Eleven We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2013cv00546
Plaintiff: Djiby Nam
Defendant: 7-Eleven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?