Cases 11 - 20 of 134
April Ledford v. Bryson City Police Department
as 23-1442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APRIL LEDFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYSON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRIS DUDLEY, Deputy, Resource Officer, CURTIS COCHRAN, Swain County Sheriff and others
Defendant:
BETH MCDONALD, CNA, Smoky Mountain Urgent Care and DANIEL SCOTT PEARSON, Detention Officer
US v. Elijah Swain
as 23-4243
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ELIJAH RAKWON SWAIN, a/k/a Eli
Swain v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Wendell Swain
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
US v. Swain Clarke
as 22-7286
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SWAIN CLARKE, a/k/a Swain Clark
US v. Michael Swain
as 22-4140
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL GRAY SWAIN
NOC Properties, LLC et al v. Great Smoky Mountains Railroad, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00170
Counter Defendant:
NOC Retail, LLC, Nantahala Outdoor Center, LLC, NOC Properties, LLC and others
Defendant:
NC Department of Transportation, Swain County, U.S. Forest Service and others
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Great Smoky Mountains Railroad, LLC
Phillips v. Naphcare, Inc., et al.
as 5:2021ct03099
Defendant:
Christy Bunn, Joseph Lee Hackett, Thomas B. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Denise Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galeas v. Carter et al
as 5:2021ct03081
Defendant:
Martrina B. Carter, Larry K. Swain, William M. Mouring and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas, Jr. and Jorge Gevara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galeas v. Swain et al
as 5:2021ct03057
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas, Jr. and Jorge Gevara
Defendant:
Captain Perry, Larry K. Swain, Mike Causey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
