Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Soriano v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02822
Plaintiff:
Flora Soriano
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Soriano v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv10702
Plaintiff:
Isabel Soriano
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Devine et al v. City of Hampton, Virginia
as 4:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Devine , Nathaniel Adibi , William L. Alexander and others
Defendant:
City of Hampton, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
US v. Dagoberto Tiznado
as 13-7860
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAGOBERTO TIZNADO, a/k/a Dago Berto Tiznado, a/k/a Dagoberto Soriano-Tiznado, a/k/a Walter Soriano
Soriano et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv00939
Plaintiff:
Josie Soriano and Thomas Soriano
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Soriano et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08866
Plaintiff:
Gloria Soriano and Antonio Soriano
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Dagoberto Tiznado
as 12-4460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAGOBERTO TIZNADO, a/k/a Dago Berto Tiznado, a/k/a Dagoberto Soriano-Tiznado, a/k/a Walter Soriano
US v. Faustino Soriano-Flore
as 12-4447
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FAUSTINO SORIANO-FLORES
Hawks v. Cirrus Group Holding Company et al
as 3:2011cv00298
Plaintiff:
Tracy Hawks
Defendant:
Cirrus Group Holding Company , Cirrus Medical Staffing, Inc , Cirrus Holdings USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
SORIANO-ENRIQUEZ v. USA
as 1:2010cv00419
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CARLOS DAVID SORIANO-ENRIQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
