Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Anita Puryear v. Tina Shrader
as 13-1680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANITA PURYEAR
Defendant - Appellee:
TINA SHRADER, VICKY CRONE, THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary and others
Philip Morris USA, Incorporate v. Thomas Vilsack
as 12-2498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee:
CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ray et al v. Vilsack et al
as 5:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
Hosea M. Ray , Rikki Harrison , People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and others
Defendant:
Thomas J. Vilsack and United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PURYEAR v. SHRADER et al
as 8:2011cv03640
Plaintiff:
ANITA PURYEAR
Defendant:
TINA SHRADER, VICKY CRONE, Thomas J. Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv03250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nellie Chamblee v. Thomas Vilsack
as 11-1343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NELLIE D. CHAMBLEE
Plaintiff:
ALL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary, U. S. Department of Agriculture
Eddie Wise v. Tom Vilsack
as 11-1271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE WISE and DOROTHY MONROE-WISE
Plaintiff:
ALL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Gary Grant v. Thomas Vilsack
as 11-1182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY GRANT, executor of the estate of Matthew Grant
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.