Cases 11 - 20 of 24,569
COOGLE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00521
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY SEAN COOGLE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bartlett v. Tran et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bartlett
Defendant:
Trach Tran and Max Transport USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
White v. USA
as 8:2024cv03617
Petitioner:
Andrew Latroy White
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mabry v. USA
as 5:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
"TJ"
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Martinez-Yanez v. USA
as 3:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
Salvador Martinez-Yanez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Arbaiza et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
William I. Arbaiza and Barbara M. Arbaiza
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Baltimore Pile Driving and Marine Construction, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 8:2024cv01796
Plaintiff:
Baltimore Pile Driving and Marine Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Sunpower Corporation Systems and TotalEnergies Distributed Generation USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Moran v. USA
as 5:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Emilio R. Moran
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Biongo v. USA
as 5:2024cv00345
Petitioner:
Bob Biongo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Haughtland Resources LLC v. SWN Production Company, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Haughtland Resources LLC
Defendant:
SWN Production Company, LLC, Equinor USA Onshore Properties, Inc. and Jamestown Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
