Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Burnell v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 8:2018cv00249
Plaintiff:
Marc Burnell
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Montgomery County Police Dept. and DC Metropolitan Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
US v. Terricious Brook
as 16-6004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TERRICIOUS BURNELL BROOKS, a/k/a Turkey
VantageSouth Bank successor-in-interest to The East Carolina Bank v. Catcher, Official No. 911872 et al
as 4:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
VantageSouth Bank successor-in-interest to The East Carolina Bank
Defendant:
Stephen C. Burnell, Elizabeth K. Burnell and Catcher, Official No. 911872
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 951
Brooks v. USA
as 2:2013cv00040
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terricious Burnell Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. Terricious Brook
as 11-4748
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TERRICIOUS BURNELL BROOKS, a/k/a Turkey
Rickey Smith v. T. Burnell
as 09-7821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKEY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
T. BURNELL, Sergeant, JOHN DOE, Lieutenant and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Smith v. Burnell et al
as 4:2008cv01089
Plaintiff:
Ricky Smith
Defendant:
T Burnell, John Doe and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Builders Mutual Insurance Company v. Terry Lemonds Builders Inc et al
as 3:2007cv00248
Plaintiff:
Builders Mutual Insurance Company and Builders Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Terry Lemonds Builders Inc, Terry Lemonds, Rick Burnell and others
Counter Claimant:
Rick Burnell, Rick Burnell, Jeris Burnell and others
Counter Defendant:
Builders Mutual Insurance Company and Builders Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
