Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Lombardo v. Johns et al
as 4:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lombardo
Defendant:
Tracy W. Johns, Loretta Lynch, Paul M. O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2015cv04439
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Smith v. Coakley et al
as 5:2015cv14052
Petitioner:
Kareem Santiez Smith
Respondent:
Joe Coakley, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Achter v. United States District Court et al
as 5:2015hc02237
Petitioner:
Leslie Allen Achter
Respondent:
United States District Court, Chief Justice Judges, Charles E. Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leibelson v. Samuels, et. al.
as 5:2015cv12863
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Leibelson
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Louis C. Eichenlaub, John F. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leon Morris v. Charles Samuels, Jr.
as 15-7364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON AARON MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of the Bureau of Prisons, C. EICHENLAUB, Regional Director for the Mid-Atlantic Regional Office, R. A. PURDUE, Warden of F.C.I. Gilmer and others
Scott v. Carnell et al
as 5:2015cv12525
Plaintiff:
Everette Scott
Defendant:
William Carnell, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Joel Coakley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
King v. Lynch et al
as 5:2015ct03208
Plaintiff:
John Blanford King
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Charles Ratledge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015ct03166
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. King
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Charles Ratledge, Vikki Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fields v. Coakley et al
as 5:2015cv09187
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kevin Fields
Defendant:
Joseph Coakley and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
