Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1336
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) et al
as 3:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), Citizenship & Immigration Services (CIS), Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mutekis Williams v. Henry McMaster
as 22-6099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUTEKIS JAMAR WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Gov., BRYAN STERLING, Commissioner SCDC and CHARLES WILLIAMS, Warden of Perry CI
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pittman v. FCA US LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00139
Plaintiff:
Roy Pittman
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, Merrimac Motors Incorporated doing business as Pomoco Chrysler Jeep Dodge (Newport News CI) and Old Point Financial Corporation doing business as Old Point National Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
