Cases 21 - 30 of 157
Crittington v. McFadden et al
as 3:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden, Savory Sheryl Drakeford, K. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Dupraz Crittington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Tory v. Clint Davis
as 21-6649
Defendant / Appellee:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator for Western Region of the Virginia Department of Corrections, LIEUTENANT B. MITCHELL, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ELLERY TORY
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Adams v. Wallace et al
as 0:2021cv01111
Defendant:
Thomas Commander, Terrie Wallace, SGT Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Alton Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Bixby v. Bryan Stirling
as 21-5
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections, WILLIE D. DAVIS, Warden, Kirkland Reception and Evaluation Center and LYDELL CHESTNUT, Deputy Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution Secure Facility
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN VERNON BIXBY
Sabrina Davis v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company
as 21-1343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SABRINA D. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Davis v. USA-2255
as 1:2021cv00795
Respondent:
USA-2255
Petitioner:
Demetrius D. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ahmed v. Tucker et al
as 1:2021cv00355
Defendant:
M. Davis, Lt. Tucker, L. Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
Shabazz Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rickels v. Leu et al
as 5:2021ct03050
Defendant:
T. Kilpatrick, D. Davis, Bobby McClure and others
Plaintiff:
Colton Rickels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 7:2021cv00061
Defendant:
A. David Robinson, K. Breeding, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Jameson James Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Niblock v. Michael Nachmanoff
as 20-2273
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN D. DAVIS and MICHAEL NACHMANOFF
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. NIBLOCK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
