Cases 21 - 30 of 488
Jose Rodriguez-Amaya v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2052
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ-AMAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Bane et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv04821
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bane, Francisco Acovera, Investigator Clay Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Mariano Ospina Baraya v. Francisco Ospina Baraya
as 23-1982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIANO OSPINA BARAYA
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANCISCO JAVIER OSPINA BARAYA, HELENA BARAYA DE OSPINA, RAFAEL IGNACIO OSPINA BARAYA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Watkins v. Dervona et al
as 1:2023cv02536
Plaintiff:
Elia T. Watkins
Defendant:
Nurse Francisco Dervona, Dr. Alam and Dr. Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco Romero v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1915
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
ACOSTA v. CALDWELL CORRECTIONAL CTR.
as 1:2023cv00750
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANCISCO ACOSTA
Respondent:
CALDWELL CORRECTIONAL CTR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ryan Francisco v. Timothy Tibbs
as 23-6850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN FRANCISCO
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY TIBBS, MICHAEL COSTELLO, SHANNON SAMS and others
Romero Gonzalez et al v. Noba Electric LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02178
Plaintiff:
Jorge Daniel Romero Gonzalez, Eduardo Hernandez Mendoza, Gerson Emilio Chacon Guzman and others
Defendant:
Noba Electric LLC, D&A Contractors, Inc. and Francisco Miranda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
