Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Sawbill Companies, Inc. v. Masonite Corporation
as 20-2045
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NIGEL GAY, PATRICIA OLSON, SAWBILL COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW KNIGHT, JUSTIN VERSCHOORE, WALLY BLOSS and others
Defendant:
JELD-WEN, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
MASONITE CORPORATION
Gregory Royal v. Michelle Lee
as 19-1535
Defendant / Appellee:
WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., Secrectary, United States Department of Commerce (Patent and Trademark Office), MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY ALLEN ROYAL
US v. Gregory Reeves
as 20-7354
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY ALLEN REEVES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 20-6454
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH COOPER, Psy. Dr./MHU Staff, SHANNON COLEMAN, MHU Staff, KEN BOWLIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. D.G. Allen Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00468
Defendant:
Donald Gregory Allen and D.G. Allen Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff:
State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Gregory Oaks
as 19-7602
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY ALLEN OAKS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Korns v. Saul
as 1:2019cv02235
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Korns, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sloan v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00028
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Sloan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOLT v. USA
as 1:2019cv00744
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
GREGORY ALLEN HOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00940
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
