Cases 21 - 30 of 158
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6597
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden, DEAN LOCKLEAR, Associate Warden, Scotland Correctional Institute, MS. S. BRADDY, Case Manager, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden, DEAN LOCKLEAR, Associate Warden, Scotland Correctional Institute, MS. S. BRADDY, Case Manager, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
GEE et al v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
as 1:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GEE, BARRY WILLIAMS, DEWEY GOOLSBY and others
Defendant:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Hatcher v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hatcher
Defendant:
Harold Clark and Dr. William York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIVENS-BEY v. FNU - CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE GIVENS-BEY, IV
Defendant:
FNU - CARTER, FNU - REVELS, FNU - ADKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Oloo et al
as 1:2021cv01350
Plaintiff:
Quashawn Akeem Hatcher
Defendant:
Oloo and Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Clark et al
as 7:2021cv00593
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hatcher
Defendant:
Harold Clark and Dr. William York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Willet
as 1:2021cv01256
Plaintiff:
Jason Hatcher
Defendant:
Meherrin River Regional Jail and Crystal Willet
MEYERS v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MR. JACOBS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. S. BRADDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
