Cases 21 - 30 of 3,085
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv02468
Plaintiff:
Gerald E. Andrews, Mary Margaret Baker, John Franklin Bishop and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Henry Haeger v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv02563
Defendant:
3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Haeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Spann v. Gov; Henry McMaster et al
as 3:2024cv02345
Plaintiff:
Freddy Spann
Defendant:
Gov; Henry McMaster and Mental Health Der Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alleyne v. Tomlinson et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Alleyne
Defendant:
L. Tomlinson, P. Henry, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Baskin, Jr v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv02307
Defendant:
3M Company, The, EIDP Inc, Du Pont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Baskin, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv02108
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown, Kenneth Adams, Johnny Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Henry Clifton Partridge Jr v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv02181
Defendant:
3M Company, The, EIDP Inc, Du Pont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Clifton Partridge, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Gerald Henry
as 24-4213
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GERALD L. HENRY, a/k/a Unc, agent of G, a/k/a G-ball
Conner v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
John Henry Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden, Merick Garland and Colet Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
